SHAP Values for Binary Classification

by

1. Introduction

Why Interpretability Matters in Binary Classification

“A machine learning model is only as good as your ability to trust it.”

I’ve worked with enough ML models to know that a high accuracy score means nothing if I can’t explain why a model makes certain predictions. This becomes critical in high-stakes fields like finance, healthcare, and fraud detection, where one wrong prediction can cost millions—or even lives.

For example, in a credit scoring model, a rejected loan application must come with an explanation. If a bank tells a customer, “Sorry, your loan was denied,” without explaining why, that’s a compliance nightmare. The same applies in healthcare—if an ML model predicts a high risk of disease, doctors need to know which factors contributed to that decision.

But here’s the catch: Most powerful models (like deep learning and ensemble methods) are black boxes. More complexity usually means less interpretability. That’s the trade-off we’re always dealing with—how do you balance model performance and explainability?

This is where SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) comes in. Unlike traditional feature importance techniques, SHAP doesn’t just tell you which features are important—it tells you why and how much each feature contributed to a specific prediction.

Where SHAP Fits in the Explainability Landscape

There are many interpretability methods out there—LIME, Integrated Gradients, Permutation Importance. I’ve used them all, and while each has its use case, SHAP is the gold standard for a reason.

  • LIME is great for local explanations, but it perturbs data randomly, which can sometimes lead to unstable results.
  • Permutation Importance is useful, but it fails to capture feature interactions properly.
  • Integrated Gradients works well for deep learning models, but it’s not as intuitive for tree-based models.

SHAP, on the other hand, is backed by solid game theory principles and follows three essential properties:
✔ Local Accuracy – The sum of SHAP values equals the model’s output.
✔ Consistency – If a feature becomes more important, its SHAP value won’t decrease.
✔ Missingness – Features that aren’t used in a prediction get a SHAP value of zero.

In short, SHAP isn’t just another tool—it’s the closest thing we have to a universally applicable explanation method for ML models. That’s why I always reach for it when I need trustworthy, transparent, and mathematically sound explanations.

2. The Mathematics Behind SHAP (Not Just the Basics)

SHAP as a Game Theory Concept

Imagine you and your friends contribute money to buy a gift. Some put in more than others, but in the end, the group effort determines the total cost. Now, if you were to fairly split the responsibility of the final price, how much should each person pay?

This is essentially what SHAP values do—but for machine learning models. Instead of money, we’re distributing credit for a model’s prediction among the input features.

SHAP is rooted in Shapley values from cooperative game theory, which Nobel laureate Lloyd Shapley developed to fairly distribute payouts among players. The same concept applies to ML:

  • Each feature in your dataset is a player.
  • The model’s output is the total payout.
  • SHAP values distribute credit among features based on their contributions.

The formula itself isn’t something you need to compute manually, but if you’re curious, it looks like this:

It essentially computes the average contribution of each feature across all possible feature subsets, ensuring a fair distribution of credit. This fairness principle is what makes SHAP so reliable.

Kernel SHAP vs. Tree SHAP: Understanding the Differences

Now, not all SHAP implementations are created equal. The method you use depends on the type of model you’re working with.

  • Kernel SHAP is model-agnostic but slow. It estimates SHAP values using sampling and works on any model, but it doesn’t scale well for large datasets.
  • Tree SHAP, on the other hand, is optimized for tree-based models (like XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest). It calculates exact SHAP values in polynomial time, making it much faster than Kernel SHAP.

I learned this the hard way when I first tried Kernel SHAP on an XGBoost model with 100,000+ samples. It took hours to compute, while Tree SHAP did it in seconds. So, if you’re using tree-based models, always go with Tree SHAP.

For deep learning, there’s also Deep SHAP, which extends SHAP principles to neural networks, though it’s more complex to implement.

How SHAP Handles Feature Interactions

One of the things I love about SHAP is its ability to account for feature interactions—something that traditional feature importance methods completely miss.

Let’s say you’re predicting whether a customer will default on a loan. Two features—income and debt-to-income ratio—might be individually important. But together, they tell a much bigger story. Someone with a high income but also a high debt-to-income ratio might be at higher risk than someone with a lower income but minimal debt.

SHAP captures these kinds of interactions automatically, making it one of the most robust tools for feature attribution.

Final Thoughts on SHAP’s Math

I know—math can feel abstract. But the beauty of SHAP is that it takes these complex mathematical concepts and makes them practical.

You don’t need to manually compute Shapley values. You just need to understand the intuition:

  • SHAP assigns fair credit to features.
  • It works efficiently for tree models (Tree SHAP).
  • It handles feature interactions better than any other method.

This is why I keep coming back to SHAP—it just works, and it works well.

3. Implementing SHAP for Binary Classification (Hands-on Guide)

SHAP is great in theory, but where it really shines is in practical implementation. I’ve used it across multiple projects, and let me tell you—understanding the outputs can be a game-changer. But before we get to interpreting SHAP plots, let’s start with getting the model up and running.

Step 1: Model Training

I usually work with XGBoost or Random Forest for binary classification, mainly because they’re fast, powerful, and well-supported by SHAP. Here’s a quick way to train an XGBoost model on a binary classification dataset.

🔹 Dataset: I’ll use the UCI Credit Default dataset—real-world, messy, and exactly the kind of data where SHAP is useful.

Code: Training an XGBoost Model

import shap
import xgboost as xgb
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score

# Load dataset
df = pd.read_csv("credit_default.csv")  # Replace with your dataset
X = df.drop(columns=["default"])  # Features
y = df["default"]  # Target variable

# Train-test split
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)

# Train XGBoost model
model = xgb.XGBClassifier(n_estimators=100, learning_rate=0.05)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)

# Predictions
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)
print(f"Model Accuracy: {accuracy_score(y_test, y_pred):.4f}")

At this point, we have a functioning model. But here’s the real question: Can we trust its predictions? That’s where SHAP comes in.

Step 2: Computing SHAP Values

Now, let’s get to the good part—calculating SHAP values.

Here’s where most people make a mistake: they compute SHAP values for the entire dataset, which can be extremely slow. I learned this the hard way when I first ran Kernel SHAP on a dataset with 100,000+ samples—it nearly crashed my system.

To avoid that, you should:
✅ Use Tree SHAP for tree-based models (like XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest).
✅ Sample a subset of data if you’re working with a large dataset.

Code: Computing SHAP Values Efficiently

# Create a SHAP explainer
explainer = shap.Explainer(model)

# Compute SHAP values (efficient Tree SHAP method)
shap_values = explainer(X_test)

# Convert to NumPy for faster processing
shap_values_array = shap_values.values

That’s it! SHAP values are ready. But raw numbers don’t mean much—we need to visualize them to understand the model’s decision-making.

Step 3: Interpreting SHAP Plots

This is where SHAP becomes a game-changer. Visualizing SHAP values helps pinpoint the most influential features, detect feature interactions, and even debug unexpected model behavior.

Let’s break down the four essential SHAP plots I always check.

1️⃣ SHAP Summary Plot – Which Features Matter Most?

When I first started using SHAP, the summary plot was my go-to. Why? Because in one chart, it shows which features drive predictions the most.

🔹 What it does:

  • Ranks features by importance.
  • Shows the direction (positive/negative impact on predictions).
  • Reveals feature interactions via color coding.

Code: Generating the Summary Plot

shap.summary_plot(shap_values, X_test)

✅ Use case: If you want a quick overview of how your model is making decisions, start here.

2️⃣ SHAP Force Plot – Explaining Individual Predictions

Ever needed to explain a single prediction? That’s exactly what the force plot is for.

🔹 Why it’s useful:

  • Shows how individual features push a prediction higher or lower.
  • Makes it easy to justify decisions to stakeholders.

Code: Generating a Force Plot for a Single Prediction

shap.initjs()
shap.force_plot(explainer.expected_value, shap_values[0], X_test.iloc[0])

✅ Use case: Model debugging—if a prediction looks odd, this plot helps trace back the reasoning.

3️⃣ SHAP Dependence Plot – Detecting Feature Interactions

This might surprise you: Feature importance alone isn’t enough. Sometimes, a feature’s effect depends on another feature.

🔹 What it does:

  • Shows how a feature impacts predictions.
  • Highlights interactions between features.

Code: Generating a Dependence Plot

shap.dependence_plot("income", shap_values, X_test)

✅ Use case: When I suspect that two features influence each other, this plot confirms it.

4️⃣ SHAP Decision Plot – The Full Decision Path

Ever had a stakeholder ask, “How exactly did the model make this decision?”

🔹 Why it’s useful:

  • Shows the entire path leading to a decision.
  • Clearly visualizes how features accumulate to form a prediction.

Code: Generating a Decision Plot

shap.decision_plot(explainer.expected_value, shap_values[:10], X_test.iloc[:10])

✅ Use case: When you need to break down complex decisions step by step.

4. Common Pitfalls & Best Practices

SHAP is powerful, but if you’ve ever worked with it in real-world projects, you know it’s easy to misinterpret the results. I’ve seen even experienced data scientists make certain mistakes that can completely skew their conclusions. Let’s go over the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them.

Misinterpreting SHAP Values

1️⃣ SHAP ≠ Causality

Here’s a common mistake I’ve seen (and honestly, one I made myself early on): assuming that SHAP explains causality. It doesn’t.

🔹 What SHAP actually tells you:

  • It quantifies the contribution of each feature to a specific prediction.
  • It shows how much a feature influences the model output, but not whether that feature is the actual cause of the outcome.

🔹 Why this matters:

  • If your model predicts that a patient has a high risk of heart disease, and SHAP assigns a high value to “high cholesterol,” that doesn’t mean cholesterol causes heart disease—it just means the model has learned a strong correlation.

✅ How to avoid this mistake:

  • Combine SHAP with domain knowledge. Don’t take the outputs at face value.
  • Use causal inference techniques if your goal is to determine cause-and-effect relationships.

2️⃣ Magnitude ≠ Impact Direction

You might be wondering: If a feature has a high SHAP value, does that mean it’s a “good” feature?

Not necessarily. SHAP values tell you the strength of the influence, not whether that influence is positive or negative.

🔹 Real-world example:

  • Suppose you’re using SHAP to interpret a credit scoring model, and “total debt” has the highest SHAP value.
  • A high debt value might indicate financial risk (bad for approval).
  • But in some cases, it could also mean a person has multiple loans and a strong credit history (good for approval).

✅ How to avoid this mistake:

  • Always check SHAP’s sign (+/-). A high absolute SHAP value just means the feature is important—it doesn’t tell you whether it’s driving the prediction up or down.
  • Use SHAP dependence plots to see how a feature behaves in different contexts.

Performance Considerations

If you’ve ever worked with SHAP on large datasets, you know it can be painfully slow. I once ran Kernel SHAP on a dataset with millions of records, and it took hours—definitely not ideal in production.

Here’s how to optimize SHAP performance:

1️⃣ Choose the Right SHAP Method

Not all SHAP algorithms are created equal.

SHAP MethodBest ForProsCons
Tree SHAPXGBoost, LightGBM, Random ForestFast, exactOnly works for tree models
Kernel SHAPAny ML modelModel-agnosticExtremely slow
Deep SHAPDeep learning modelsEfficient for neural netsRequires background data
Sampling SHAPLarge datasetsApproximate, fastLess precise

✅ Best practice: If you’re working with tree-based models, always use Tree SHAP—it’s exponentially faster than Kernel SHAP.

2️⃣ Use Approximation Methods for Large Datasets

Even with the best SHAP method, calculating SHAP values on a large dataset isn’t practical. Here’s how I handle it:

✅ Use a random sample of the data. In most cases, using just 1,000–10,000 samples is enough to get reliable insights.
✅ Use feature grouping. If you have correlated features, group them together to reduce computation.
✅ Leverage GPU acceleration. Some SHAP implementations support CUDA for faster processing.

Feature Correlation Issues

This might surprise you: SHAP values can be misleading if your features are highly correlated.

1️⃣ Why Correlation Can Be a Problem

SHAP assumes that features are independent when calculating their contributions. But in reality, features often have strong correlations—and this can lead to misleading attributions.

🔹 Example:

  • Suppose you’re predicting house prices, and you have two features:
    • “Square footage”
    • “Number of bedrooms”
  • These two features are highly correlated—bigger houses tend to have more bedrooms.
  • SHAP might split their importance arbitrarily, making it unclear which one actually drives the predictions.

2️⃣ How to Fix It

✅ Feature selection. If two features contain similar information, remove one of them.
✅ Use grouped SHAP values. Instead of looking at individual features, group correlated features and analyze them together.
✅ Run PCA or feature clustering before applying SHAP to reduce redundancy.

5. Real-World Use Cases of SHAP in Binary Classification

I’ve used SHAP in multiple domains, but here are some of the most impactful real-world use cases I’ve come across.

Healthcare: Diagnosing Diseases with SHAP

When working with disease prediction models, interpretability is not optional—doctors need to understand why a model is making its predictions.

Example: Predicting Heart Disease

A model predicts that a patient has a 90% risk of heart disease. SHAP explains why:

  • High cholesterol (+0.35 SHAP value)
  • Smoking history (+0.22 SHAP value)
  • Exercise frequency (-0.18 SHAP value)

🔹 Why it’s useful: Doctors can see which risk factors contribute most to a diagnosis and provide targeted recommendations.

Fraud Detection: Explaining Suspicious Transactions

Fraud detection models are black boxes—and in finance, regulators demand transparency.

Example: Credit Card Fraud

A model flags a transaction as fraudulent, but why? SHAP reveals:

  • Transaction amount (+0.40 SHAP value) (Unusually high amount)
  • Time of transaction (+0.30 SHAP value) (Occurred at 3 AM, unusual for this customer)
  • Location (+0.25 SHAP value) (Transaction happened in another country)

🔹 Why it’s useful:

  • Helps fraud analysts quickly verify suspicious transactions.
  • Enables banks to explain fraud decisions to customers.

Credit Scoring: Fair & Explainable AI for Loan Approvals

Loan applicants often ask: “Why was my loan rejected?” SHAP provides an answer.

Example: Loan Approval Decision

A model predicts a low credit score, and SHAP explains:

  • High debt-to-income ratio (+0.45 SHAP value)
  • Late payment history (+0.30 SHAP value)
  • Stable employment (-0.25 SHAP value, reducing risk)

🔹 Why it’s useful:

  • Helps banks comply with fair lending regulations.
  • Allows customers to improve their creditworthiness based on transparent insights.

6. Advanced Topics & Future Trends

If you’ve worked with SHAP long enough, you know its applications extend far beyond structured tabular data. I’ve personally explored SHAP in deep learning, NLP, and AutoML, and let me tell you—it’s both fascinating and complex.

While SHAP’s original implementation was tailored for tree-based models, researchers and engineers have pushed its boundaries into neural networks, computer vision, and automated machine learning. Let’s explore where SHAP is headed.

SHAP in Deep Learning Models

Deep learning models, especially neural networks, are notoriously difficult to interpret. Unlike decision trees, which have clear branching logic, deep models have thousands (or millions) of parameters interacting in complex ways.

So, how do we make deep models explainable?

1️⃣ Deep SHAP: Adapting SHAP for Neural Networks

Deep SHAP builds on DeepLIFT (Deep Learning Important FeaTures) and adapts it to SHAP’s framework. Instead of estimating SHAP values by perturbing inputs (which would be computationally infeasible for large networks), Deep SHAP:

✅ Backpropagates SHAP values through the network.
✅ Uses reference/background samples to approximate attributions.
✅ Works efficiently on deep models compared to Kernel SHAP.

🔹 Example: Suppose you’re using a deep neural network to predict customer churn. Deep SHAP can show:

  • Which features (e.g., “Customer Tenure” or “Monthly Charges”) influence predictions the most.
  • How intermediate layers contribute to decision-making.

👉 Key takeaway: If you’re working with deep learning, always prefer Deep SHAP over Kernel SHAP for efficiency.

SHAP for Text and Image Data

You might be wondering: Can SHAP explain NLP models and computer vision models?

Yes, but with some important adaptations.

1️⃣ SHAP for NLP: Explaining Transformer-Based Models

If you’ve ever tried explaining a BERT or GPT-based model, you know it’s not as simple as tabular data. In NLP, we’re dealing with sequences of words, contextual embeddings, and attention mechanisms.

SHAP’s approach to NLP:
✅ Token-level attributions – Assigns SHAP values to individual words.
✅ Layer-wise backpropagation – Similar to Deep SHAP but applied to text embeddings.
✅ Explaining sentiment models, chatbots, and spam detectors.

🔹 Example: If a BERT model predicts a tweet as toxic, SHAP can highlight specific words that triggered that classification (e.g., “offensive” vs. “sarcastic”).

👉 Key takeaway: SHAP works well for NLP but requires tokenization-aware methods.

2️⃣ SHAP for Computer Vision: Explaining CNNs

Explaining Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is even trickier because images are high-dimensional. Unlike tabular data, a CNN’s features (pixels) don’t have clear semantic meanings.

So, how do we interpret CNNs?

✅ Pixel-level SHAP attributions – Assigns SHAP values to regions of an image rather than individual pixels.
✅ Overlays SHAP explanations on images to show which areas influence predictions.
✅ Works alongside Grad-CAM to provide human-interpretable heatmaps.

🔹 Example: In medical imaging, SHAP can explain why a CNN detects pneumonia in an X-ray, highlighting lung regions with abnormalities.

👉 Key takeaway: SHAP makes CNNs more interpretable but is computationally expensive. Use approximations.

AutoML & SHAP: The Future of Automated Explainability

If you’ve used AutoML platforms like Google AutoML, H2O.ai, or AutoGluon, you know that explainability is often an afterthought. However, SHAP is now being integrated into AutoML frameworks to make model selection and tuning more transparent.

1️⃣ How SHAP Enhances AutoML

🔹 Feature Selection: SHAP helps AutoML automatically discard low-impact features.
🔹 Hyperparameter Optimization: AutoML can prioritize models with high interpretability.
🔹 Regulatory Compliance: AutoML frameworks can generate SHAP reports for business stakeholders.

👉 Key takeaway: AutoML + SHAP = Transparent, automated, and interpretable AI pipelines.

Regulatory Compliance & AI Ethics

This might surprise you: SHAP is becoming a key tool in AI regulations and ethics.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and law, AI models can’t be black boxes. Regulators are demanding explainable AI, and SHAP is at the forefront.

1️⃣ Why SHAP is Crucial for AI Regulations

🔹 GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation): Requires models to provide “meaningful explanations” for automated decisions.
🔹 Fair Lending Laws: In banking, SHAP helps ensure credit scoring models aren’t biased.
🔹 Healthcare Compliance: Doctors need to understand why an AI suggests a diagnosis before acting on it.

🔹 Example: If an AI rejects a loan, SHAP can pinpoint the exact reasons, making financial decisions more transparent and legally defensible.

👉 Key takeaway: Regulatory frameworks are making SHAP (or similar explainability methods) mandatory in high-stakes AI.

7. Conclusion & Final Thoughts

We’ve covered a lot—from the basics of SHAP to its future in deep learning, NLP, AutoML, and regulatory compliance. But before wrapping up, let’s distill the most critical takeaways.

Key Takeaways

✅ SHAP is one of the most powerful interpretability tools, but it’s not foolproof.
✅ It works best with tree-based models but extends to deep learning and AutoML.
✅ Feature correlation can lead to misleading SHAP values—use grouping techniques.
✅ Regulatory frameworks are increasingly relying on SHAP for AI transparency.

When to Use SHAP vs. Other Explainability Methods

While SHAP is powerful, it’s not always the best choice. Here’s a quick decision framework:

ScenarioBest Explainability Method
Tree-based models (XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest)SHAP (Tree SHAP)
Deep learning (Neural Networks, CNNs, RNNs)Deep SHAP, Grad-CAM, LIME
NLP models (Transformers, LSTMs)SHAP for Text, Integrated Gradients
Tabular data, black-box modelsSHAP (Kernel SHAP, Sampling SHAP)
Time-sensitive explanationsLIME (faster but less accurate than SHAP)

👉 Key takeaway: Use SHAP when you need high-fidelity explanations, but consider LIME or Grad-CAM for speed.

Next Steps for Practitioners

If you’re serious about mastering SHAP, here’s what I’d recommend next:

📌 Read SHAP’s original research paper:

  • Lundberg & Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions” (NeurIPS 2017).

📌 Explore SHAP’s GitHub repository:

📌 Experiment with SHAP in real projects:

  • Try SHAP on a Kaggle dataset (fraud detection, credit scoring, healthcare).
  • Compare SHAP to other methods like LIME and Integrated Gradients.

📌 Keep up with SHAP’s latest developments:

  • Follow researchers working on interpretability (Scott Lundberg, Cynthia Rudin).
  • Stay updated with explainable AI papers in NeurIPS, ICML, and CVPR.

Leave a Comment